Skip to main content
An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) – Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of HSE

An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS)

Citation

Marten, R.; McIntyre, D.; Travassos, C.; Shishkin, S.; Longde, W.; Reddy, S.; & Vega, J. (2014). An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). Lancet, 384(9960), 2164-2171. PMCID: PMC7134989

Abstract

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) represent almost half the world's population, and all five national governments recently committed to work nationally, regionally, and globally to ensure that universal health coverage (UHC) is achieved. This analysis reviews national efforts to achieve UHC. With a broad range of health indicators, life expectancy (ranging from 53 years to 73 years), and mortality rate in children younger than 5 years (ranging from 10·3 to 44·6 deaths per 1000 livebirths), a review of progress in each of the BRICS countries shows that each has some way to go before achieving UHC. The BRICS countries show substantial, and often similar, challenges in moving towards UHC. On the basis of a review of each country, the most pressing problems are: raising insufficient public spending; stewarding mixed private and public health systems; ensuring equity; meeting the demands for more human resources; managing changing demographics and disease burdens; and addressing the social determinants of health. Increases in public funding can be used to show how BRICS health ministries could accelerate progress to achieve UHC. Although all the BRICS countries have devoted increased resources to health, the biggest increase has been in China, which was probably facilitated by China's rapid economic growth. However, the BRICS country with the second highest economic growth, India, has had the least improvement in public funding for health. Future research to understand such different levels of prioritisation of the health sector in these countries could be useful. Similarly, the role of strategic purchasing in working with powerful private sectors, the effect of federal structures, and the implications of investment in primary health care as a foundation for UHC could be explored. These issues could serve as the basis on which BRICS countries focus their efforts to share ideas and strategies.

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60075-1

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year Published

2014

Journal Title

Lancet

Author(s)

Marten, R.
McIntyre, D.
Travassos, C.
Shishkin, S.
Longde, W.
Reddy, S.
Vega, J.

PMCID

PMC7134989